Bourdieu, Reflexivity, and Scientific Practice

نویسندگان

چکیده

In this paper, we will analyse Bourdieu’s concept of reflexivity and attempt to clear up misunderstandings misrecognitions attached it, while expanding its analytical framework. doing so, hope that future research using the Bourdieu framework achieve better results, collectively developing methods methodology. With this, intend reflexively discuss reflexivity, seeing our work as a small theoretical part large collective scientific enterprise. first section, after presenting peculiarity Bourdieusian approach, introduce before narrowing it down social sciences representation basic account it. The second section show how is grounded in argue works on several epistemological methodological levels at once through an analysis based chapter “Comprendre”, La misère du monde. third final renewed related notion gaze theory practice. L'article le de réflexivité et son rapport avec la pratique scientifique. Ce faisant, nous espérons que les recherches futures utilisant l’approche obtiendront meilleurs résultats, tout en développant collectivement ses méthodes sa méthodologie. Avec cela, entendons discuter manière réflexive réflexivité, voyant notre travail comme une petite partie théorique d'une grande entreprise scientifique collective. D'abord, décrivons dans sociales, puis montrons position se distingue ce contexte parce qu'il cherche à dépasser dualisme sujet/objet par approche relationnelle qui articule, inédite, savoirs scientifiques pratiques. Ensuite, esquissons représentation bourdieusienne basée sur sources chez Spinoza Bachelard jusqu'à complexe permet non violente pratiquer science, travers théorie pratique.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Bourdieu, Feminism and Female Physical Culture: Gender Reflexivity and the Habitus-Field Complex

Feminist theorizing in the sociology of sport and physical culture has progressed through ongoing and intense dialogue with an array of critical positions and voices in the social sciences (e.g., Judith Butler, R.W. Connell, Michel Foucault). Yet, somewhat surprisingly, the work of French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu—arguably one of modern sociology’s “most important voices of social critique an...

متن کامل

Discourse as practice: from Bourdieu to Brandom

This paper investigates Robert Brandom’s programme of logical expressivism and in the process attempts to clarify his use of the term practice, by means of a detailed comparison with the works of sociologist and anthropologist Pierre Bourdieu. It turns out that the two scholars have a number of concerns in common, including the means by which core practices can be amalgamated into more sophisti...

متن کامل

Pierre Bourdieu and the Epistemic Conditions of Social Scientific Knowledge

Pierre Bourdieu’s “epistemic reflexivity” is the cornerstone of his intellectual enterprise, underpinning his claims to provide distinctive and scientific knowledge of the social world. This article considers what this notion offers for research and how it needs to be developed further to underpin progress in social science. Many reflexive research practices are sociological, individualistic, a...

متن کامل

Australian Nurse Practitioner Practice: Value Adding through Clinical Reflexivity

The role of the Australian Nurse Practitioner (NP) is in its infancy and at a crossroads where extensive research demonstrates effective quality care and yet the role remains underrecognised and underutilised. The translation of practice into "value" is critical for the sustainability of NP roles and requires the practitioner to adopt a systematic method of inquiry. Kim's (1999) "Critical Refle...

متن کامل

Scientific Practice and Necessary Connections

In this paper I will introduce a problem for at least those Humeans who believe that the future is open. More particularly, I will argue that the following aspect of scientific practice cannot be explained by openfuture-Humeanism: There is a distinction between states that we cannot bring about (which are represented in scientific models as nomologically impossible) and states that we merely ha...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Configurações

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2182-7419', '1646-5075']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/configuracoes.15157